After a huge defeat of Congress, Rahul Gandhi resigned but not accepted in CWC. Sonia Gandhi again elected as Leader of Congress Parliamentary Party, So she will be in charge of opposition in Lok Sabha. Many of us were thought that Sonia Gandhi will retire after this but she proved ‘Nehrus and Gandhis Can Resign But Don’t Retire’
Nobody is aware of evidently whether or not Rahul Gandhi can keep the course. It’s not an issue that may be answered by either psychotherapy or speculation. he’s awake to the gravity of the political scenario and understands the uncomfortable within the Congress party. The faction and also the young brigade across many states area unit demand that he should rethink his call to quit as Congress president.
The overall impression within the media is that he’s just golf stroke up associate degree act and can be back within the saddle shortly. Some others feel that he’s without reasoning or without showing responsibility stubborn. a couple of ‘Rahul watchers’ say that he’s sulking, primarily thanks to his frustration with losing Amethi.
There are unit others, like intellectual-historian Rama Guha, WHO has stridently demanded his resignation. Lord Meghnad Desai has aforementioned that Rahul Gandhi should quit politics permanently and settle abroad.
The question that’s usually raised concerning the long run of the Congress is: will the party survive if a Nehru-Gandhi member isn’t at the top?
The first time this question was asked was once Jawaharlal Nehru was alive and in action. In 1963, W. Hangen in his 300-page book titled ‘After Nehru, Who?’, offered many names WHO may succeed Nehru. the concept of a supposed ‘dynasty’ had not crystallized then. In 1964, Lal Bahadur Shastri succeeded Nehru as India’s Prime Minister, not Indira Nehru Gandhi.
It is vital to notice that there are many Congress presidents from non-Nehru-Gandhi family – Neelam Sanjeeva Reddy (December 1959 to could 1962), S. Nijalingappa (1968-69), Jagjivan Ram (1970-1971), sitar player Dayal Sharma (1972-1974), D.K. Barooah (1975-1977), K. Brahmananda Reddy (1977-1978), P.V. Narasimha Rao (1992-1996), Sitaram Kesri (1996-1998).
The party was split double throughout this era, in 1969 and in 1977. In 1977, Indira Nehru Gandhi and also the ‘first dynast’ Sanjay Gandhi was defeated. Several analysts had then aforementioned that it had been a ‘second Independence’ below the leadership of a ‘second Mahatma’, Jayaprakash Narayan. They were positive that the ‘Nehru era’ was over with the excellent defeat of the mother and son. Few even thought that the country had been free of the yoke of the Congress rule (‘Congress-mukt’ was a term that wasn’t stylish then).
Dynasty revived by arch foes
If the ‘Peoples’ Revolution’, because the Janata Party’s ending in 1977 was delineate by some, had not folded among future 3 years, the ‘dynasty’ would have complete then and there. However the ‘dynasty’ was revived by its arch foes.
Charan Singh challenged the Morarji Desai government and toppled it in 1979. He took Indira Gandhi’s support and has become Prime Minister. The deal between Indira and Charan Singh was stricken by Sanjay. Later, Indira Nehru Gandhi withdrew her outside support to the Charan Singh government and it folded. The 1980 Lok Sabha election brought Indira Nehru Gandhi back to power.
It was Indira Gandhi’s assassination that brought Rajiv Gandhi into limelight. Sonia Gandhi was ferociously against Rajiv taking up because the PM. If Sonia was keen to continue the ‘dynasty’, she wouldn’t have opposed Rajiv Gandhi changing into the PM.
It is amusing that neither Varun Gandhi nor his mother Maneka Gandhi is ever suspect of carrying forward the folk.
They realize prominence within the BJP basically as a result of their members of the Nehru-Gandhi family. If rather than Sonia Gandhi, the family baton was passed on to Maneka, then wouldn’t it not are delineate as phratry succession?
Recognition for Dynasty
After Rajiv Gandhi’s assassination in could 1991, there was no Nehru-Gandhi member at the highest of the Congress for nearly seven years. Rapidly when Rajiv’s assassination, the whole Congress operating Committee had nemine contradicente set to create Sonia Gandhi the party president. She with politeness however firmly refused.
It was when the defeat of the Narasimha Rao government in 1996 and also the collapse of 3 ordered governments (Vajpayee’s 13-day government followed by Deve Gowda and that i.K. Gujral’s short stints as prime ministers) that Sonia set to hitch active politics in December 1997.
If in those seven years, the celebrities within the Congress, like Sharad Pawar, Madhavrao Scindia and Digvijaya Singh, had established their leadership among the party, Sonia Gandhi wouldn’t have joined, or they’d not have felt it necessary to request her to come back and head of the party. So again, the ‘dynasty’ didn’t impose itself on the party, however was urged by the highest leadership to rescue the party from additional decline.
Sonia Gandhi had did not lead her party to success in 1998 and 1999 elections. She was labeled a failure. The opposition and also the media condemned and ridiculed her for her accent, for being a foreigner and for not understanding a fancy country like Bharat. (The same commentators later referred to as her sagacious, assured and even statesman-like).
The Congress may have drop her as Sharad Pawar so tried in 1999, by cacophonic the party on the question of her foreign origin and making a brand new outfit, the Nationalist Congress Party (NCP). However Pawar’s breakaway cluster couldn’t inspire confidence and apart from a couple of, most Congress leaders remained with the Sonia Gandhi-led party.
In Sonia Gandhi’s nearly 2 decade-long tenure as Congress president, the ‘dynasty’ tag became a stigma. Though there was criticism against Sanjay Gandhi within the Nineteen Seventies and Rajiv Gandhi within the Nineteen Eighties, folk was either accepted as part-and-parcel of government or tolerated as a result of ‘there was no alternative’.
In 2004, once the BJP thought that Sonia Gandhi would become the Prime Minister, all hell bust loose – Sushma Swaraj vulnerable to shave her head in protest whereas Uma Bharti aforementioned it ‘will be the darkest day within the history’ of Bharat if Sonia became the PM.
Sonia’s refusal to become the PM created her a living legend and later the one wielding the ‘remote control’ of the Manmohan Singh government. The alleged indirect ‘dynastic control’ was condemned; however the political category conjointly took it in its stride. All parties, as well as the BJP, perpetually explored to Sonia, even once Manmohan Singh was the Prime Minister. it had been a sort of recognition for the ‘dynasty’.
Revival & Survival
The term ‘dynasty’, however, became associate degree expression of virulent abuse and disgust solely when Rahul Gandhi took to the political stage. For the last ten years, Rahul has been the target of the opposition and also the media. He has been brutally ridiculed and derided as headless. He has been wide abused on the social media. Prime Minister
Narendra Modi virtually took a wicked pleasure, sort of a bully in class, in running down the persona of Rahul Gandhi. Perhaps, no alternative person has suffered the type of humiliation that Rahul has.
And yet, from Akhilesh Yadav to Uddhav William Makepeace Thackeray, from M.K. Stalin and Kanimozhi to Y.S. Jagan Mohan Reddy, Sukhbir Singh Badal and Omar Abdullah, most are party of phratry politics. However the national condemnation and barbs area unit reserved just for the Gandhis.
The Indian National Congress is presently in pass, however still enjoys a massive following among folks and includes a inheritance of over one hundred thirty years. It will revive itself and survive with or while not the Nehru-Gandhi folk. If the Congress may march ahead when Nehru’s death and Indira and Rajiv Gandhi’s assassination, falling and rising once more, why can’t it do constant when Rahul Gandhi’s resignation?
But Rahul has created it amply clear that he’s not retiring from politics or deed from the mission he has chosen. Will we are saying that the Nehrus don’t retire, nor do they furnish up?